The Human Signal — with Laura Sheeran
The Human Signal — with Laura Sheeran

The Human Signal #52 — Getting Back on the Horse, AI Datasets, and the Cultural Significance of Music Charts [7/11]

28 June 2026 37:41 Laura Sheeran

Listen to episode

About this episode

Hello! After an unexpected two-month gap in the podcast, I’m back! The first half of this episode is me explaining what happened, why I ended up going dark for so long. I also talk a bit about the AI watchdog and how I found ten of my songs in the published datasets used to train Suno and Udio… the AI music saga continues…

Then in the second half I pick up where I left off with the 11 part series I was in the middle of posting before I paused, returning with Part 7 of #AIWTF which is an episode I recorded back in April.

Part 7 here looks at the extent to which AI music has been entering the charts, what that says about the collapse of chart integrity, and what happens when music becomes less about human choice and preference, and more about automated algorithmic success.

We then move from there onto a wider reflection on social fragmentation, the erosion of shared culture, and the need for a lot more real spaces where people can gather, play, experiment, and feel connected again through their art.

If you enjoyed this podcast please share it with a friend or consider leaving a comment or review, it really helps me out. You can also support me and my work by becoming a paid member, it’s €5 per month on Substack and Patreon. And lastly, you can still find me on YouTube / Instagram as @thepersonaproject__ & @laurasheeranie

That's all for now. Thanks for being here, and remember: Put humans first. Don't feed the machines.

Long-form edited transcript:

Hello and welcome to The Human Signal with me, Laura Sheeran. I’m back, I’m actually back. And I am about to pick up where I left off with episode 7 of my 11-part series, AI What the Fuck. But first, I’m going to explain where I’ve been, why I was gone for so long, and what I’m doing right now.

The Two Month Gap

The last episode I published went out on the 28th of April. Today is the 28th of June, so there is a two-month gap there. It was an extremely unfortunately timed issue I encountered, because I was halfway through publishing this eleven part series and even in the space of time between recording and publishing, which had only been one week at the time, everything about AI and the music industry that I had researched and discussed in the episodes was already evolving and changing. So you can only imagine how dated the un-posted second half of the episodes are now two months on!

However, I have gone back through them and listened through, and a good bit of it is still usable. I’m going to reinvigorate each episode with an opening section, so that I can commit to finally finishing the series now that I’m back.

This is so typical and the story of my life, but right before I went dark, one of the last things I posted on here was my April newsletter, in which I discussed my sense of achievement over having published so many episodes of my podcast. I was celebrating the publication of the 50th episode, which is a really big deal in my personal world. Through inconsistent posting, I had managed to overall post relatively consistently.

I wrote: this is something I never thought would happen or be possible for me to even achieve. When I published the most recent episode and I realized it was number 50, I had a moment of disbelief. I’m genuinely quite proud of this milestone because I have struggled my whole life with follow through. This is a moment where I can now look at something I’ve done and learn a new message about myself. Instead of the ongoing self-hate and shame that I have felt my whole life over my lack of follow through, I am actually able to keep something up.

A couple of days after I sent out that newsletter, I was flying to London where I was doing a photo shoot. I work as a photographer from time to time. The photo shoot went really well and I was only there for one night before flying home. In the period of time between getting onto the plane and getting off the plane, my laptop had significant screen damage and when I got home I realised the screen was completely fucked, to the point where the laptop was completely unusable.

It threw a spanner in the works. I have a pretty streamlined system that I follow with my work, and as much as I would love to be in the position where I can just run out to the store and replace it the next day, that is not my current economic situation. It ended up taking me about six weeks until I could replace the laptop.

In that time, I tried to transfer my workload from the administrative stuff and this podcast stuff that I had been doing exclusively on the laptop over to the desktop, and it just was not working.

The Brain Said NOPE!

This podcast is called The Human Signal for a reason, and in many ways this phase of two months was actually a very authentic expression of the fact that I am a human being. This was just the natural way that this scenario played out in my ability to be productive and keep on top of my tasks.

So many things started slipping through the cracks when I didn’t have my usual system set up that I can rely on and depend on. For many people, it might be very easy to just switch tasks from a laptop to a desktop. For me, it was genuinely not possible. I tried and I failed. It wasn’t for want of trying and I’m going to go into some detail here about why I think it was so challenging.

Practically speaking, I use my laptop for tasks that generally don’t overlap with the tasks I do on the desktop computer. The desktop computer I use almost exclusively for creative work, which is related to entering into a flow state and essentially completely unhooking yourself from the concept of time. When I’m video editing, editing a photograph, recording music, writing musical parts, producing songs, you’re really losing yourself into a flow state. That’s where you access the best work.

My laptop world is a different world, and I need to be in a completely different headspace when using it. When I’m working on my laptop, I’m generally doing admin or recording the podcast. Both of those things require me to be alert and present and engaged with the action of time. Usually in the morning I bring my laptop downstairs, make a coffee, do my emails, look at my calendar, take my notes, and go through the organizational stuff I need to do. It sets me up for the day ahead, and for the week ahead. When I’m doing my podcast, again I’m engaged with time and being fully switch ‘on’, looking at notes, thinking of the things, and being alert.

Whereas when I’m at my desktop, it’s all about de-hooking from time, letting time slide away from all perception of reality in that moment. That’s what flow state is, thats how I achieve my best work in that context.

The weird thing was that when I was at the desktop computer, none of the email scenario or calendar checking scenario or podcast recording scenario worked and I think it must because I’ve become so physically accustomed to entering flow state when I’m in that room and at that computer..

I missed meetings. I showed up at the wrong NCT test center. I went to a meeting a month and a day early because of my inability to read my calendar and my emails efficiently on my desktop computer.

It’s not like I wasn’t doing the emails. I was doing it, going through the motions of it, but it just was not going into my brain. None of the information would stay in there. It was like falling through a sieve.

I did my absolute best, but the amount of destruction on my professional engagements, my work and personal things as well, just losing track… I started to wonder, is this like early onset dementia? What’s going on with my cognitive ability? Thankfully it wasn’t and as soon as I got my old system back with a laptop replacement, everything started returning to normal.

It got me thinking a lot about flow state and our neurology, the neural pathways, the roads that get hammered into our brains over years and years and years. And then when you try to shift those, I don’t know how long it takes for change to become possible. Maybe if you’re in your early 20s there’s more plasticity there still, and maybe I’ve gone beyond that point in terms of age. I don’t know, but it was fascinating.

So here we are. There was six weeks where I had no laptop at all. Thankfully, I didn’t lose too many files. That means I can actually jump back in where I was in the series I had made.

The Evidence We’ve All Been Waiting For

We are about to jump into part seven, but before I do that, there has been a big development in the whole AI music thing. A lot of the datasets used to train the AI models for Suno and Udio were published recently by The Atlantic. They are searchable. Loads of artists have been going on there and searching their names, searching for their music, and finding that yes, in fact, their music has been scraped and used to train AI.

Before this point, it was all entirely speculative. It was extremely opaque. We couldn’t really see exactly what had gone in there. But this publication of the datasets has illuminated that and exposed the truth of the matter. Of course, I did search for my name and music and, in at least one of the datasets, I found that 10 of my songs have been absorbed into the AI music machine.

Was I pissed off? Of course. But I wasn’t surprised. In many ways, there was a sense of relief. I feel entirely justified now in giving out until the cows come home about this situation because it does have a direct impact.

It’s really outrageous, the amount of work that has gone into the system. But having that clarification is helpful. I think it’s going to help move things forward in what feels to me like a more ethical direction, which would be to center real human artists, real musicians, and to remember that we are here. We care. This is our work. We wrote this stuff. It belongs to us. It was never anybody else’s to take. And just because they can take whatever they think they want off you, it doesn’t mean that it’s okay or justified or legal.

Having this information explicitly available and accessible brings the major label artists and the independent artists together under the same umbrella. We all can identify with the same sense of injustice over what’s happened. The outrage is palpable no matter where in the ecosystem you fall.

All of that being said, finally now I’m jumping into part seven.

What Do Music Charts Represent Today

This episode centers mainly around the cultural significance of the charts in music, in the music industry. All of this was recorded in April, so my references to just last week, there was an artist, etcetera, take with a pinch of salt. I haven’t assessed the chart situation in the past eight weeks, so I don’t know how many AI artists have or have not been included in the charts in that time. But anyway, as of April, this was the situation.

Right now, AI music is consistently topping the charts. We’ve been seeing this since well back in last year. We had Xenia Monet. She was number one. She got signed for like $3 million in September by a non-major label. She’s an AI. And then just last week, there was another AI called Eddie Dalton, who began charting this month in April and secured 11 spots on the iTunes country charts, despite not being a real person.

The AI music is continuing to thrive in the charts. And this is obviously only possible because there is no chart integrity anymore. The fabric of how we measure the success of music is changing. Considering in Deezer’s data, 80-something percent of the AI music streams they recorded were fraudulent, the charting of these AI characters seems highly likely to involve streams or numbers that are probably not verified or not real streams.

It’s harder and harder to know because even the Billboard chart still takes streams into consideration. Obviously the iTunes chart used to be paid downloads, but bots can still influence those numbers. So the charts no longer really mean anything. We’re moving in the direction where the charts don’t measure what humans want or what humans are into or what humans are even listening to.

The way people listen to music isn’t the same. People are listening to stuff because it’s coming up on playlists, whereas before people would listen to stuff because they were obsessed with an artist. They would download that record and listen to it all the time, or they would have a playlist of their favorite artists that they made themselves. There were loads of ways that people listened, but it was targeted with the music that they knew and loved. They would be fans of an artist who would define a whole chapter in their life.

It was all part of a bigger social picture where music was creating the soundtrack to a certain time in life. Music was this sort of social glue which helped narrate the tone of our lives over time, and we all were involved in what music was fueling that because it was based on humans picking what they wanted. It was what we were vibing off. It was what music was resonating with the people.

I know the charts have always involved gatekeeping and labels dominating the charts, and I know it’s not as simple as that, but that is definitely how things were or felt at least, fado fado, and things couldn’t be further from that now.

People don’t even know who they’re listening to. They might have a song on repeat and not know the name of the artist because it’s just been on a playlist. So the people getting into the charts are not reflective of humanity and our autonomy in choosing and seeking the music that’s truly resonating with us for a cultural moment. It’s just whatever the playlist has put you with. Yes, it’s algorithmically generated and yes, you probably like it because it is based on all the other stuff you like, but it’s not intentional. There’s no autonomy in it. So the charts themselves, what do they even mean?

It reflects the broader culture as well, where there’s so much fragmentation. The way we consume our news and entertainment is all so fragmented. Everyone has their own private news cycle that they get fed because of the algorithm. No one is plugged into the same one frame of information.

There’s a sadness in me over how much music could play a role in helping us come together, accept difference, understand different perspectives, unify, be together, experience togetherness. Right now, I don’t feel that music has the kind of influence it used to have to shape cultural things. Everything has become very multi-layered, very complex, very individualistic.

The Algorithmic Creative Complex

I am calling this the algorithmic creative complex: not only the listening experience of music changing how people interact with music and how music gets spread around, but also how people approach making their music. No more than with YouTube or Instagram, there are all these rules about how you’re supposed to have the hook at the start, use this and this, have this duration, all these tricks people are supposed to incorporate to give their music a chance to be picked up by the algorithm. All these hoops you’re supposed to jump through, which I refuse to do because I don’t have time for that kind of thing, and I’m making the music I’m making and that’s just the way it is.

I think that the algorithms, and becoming a slave to the algorithms, have definitely influenced how people are approaching making their music. Not everyone, of course, but there is a shape that gets put on things collectively through a mixture of conscious and unconscious decisions. Everyone is trying to do their best to thrive and grow and produce good work, share their work with as many people as they can. And if there’s this carrot dangling in front of you saying if you do this, more people are going to hear it, part of you is definitely itching like maybe I should just do that, maybe that would help.

But that has consequences down the line, where everyone’s tiny little decisions to placate the algorithms over time collectively morph into these shifts. This is all just me thinking. This is not based on any evidence. This is just how I have been making sense of it in my head.

A lot of this podcast, the fact that I don’t pander to an algorithm, that’s a decision. It’s a conscious decision I’m making, and it’s been a decision that has allowed me to continue posting. I would have given up long ago if I was trying to make this a regular, consistent, algorithmically friendly thing, because that’s not the way my life is structured. It’s not the way the life of an artist works. I work freelance. I never have the same day twice. I can’t contort myself into the structured shape for the algorithm that it would demand off me.

Algorithmic creative complex. I think we need to dismantle that.

I guess all I’m saying is I feel there’s a reduction or a decline in the sense of having a shared cultural experience in relation to music, and I think that is making it harder for us to feel connected. I think music could really unlock a huge amount for us in this moment in time, and I don’t know what would be involved in that, but I think getting humans into shared spaces, getting music happening again.

DUBLIN AS A GRAVEYARD

Having spoken recently with many musician friends, this is the topic that keeps coming up. No matter where I am with musicians, everyone is trying to make sense of what’s happening right now. One of the things that has been consistently coming up is access to space in order for people to meet and connect and experiment and try things live, perform things, share ideas, express the humanity that is waiting to be expressed.

I would love if there were 10 times more places in Dublin where you could just rock in and set up some wacky thing and try stuff out, and that there didn’t have to be enough ticket sales to cover a 600 euro venue rental, because people can’t afford to go out. So many people I know have completely stopped going out because it is simply too expensive.

The places where culture used to thrive and grow are becoming so much harder to access. At the same time, there’s a housing crisis going on so a lot of people have been forced to move home and people have left Dublin entirely.

I know there are a few underground venues putting on gigs and promoters still hustling, but I feel like there’s not enough support in Dublin for people who are looking to organize stuff and get something going. There needs to be way more access to space. I don’t know why there’s so little space.

When I first moved to Dublin, it was absolute chaos in the best way possible, there used to be so many places.. There was stuff running every night of the week. Every basement was full. There were so many alternative spaces in Dublin where people could just do off the wall shit. It was such an alive place to be and I really miss that.

Anyway, that’s my sad love song about the old days in Dublin. I hope times are going to change soon for the better. I think we need some kind of punk resistance. We need to get off our phones is what we need to do. We need to get out into the world. We need to get back out into spaces with our instruments and with our tunes and with our voices.

That brings us to the end of part 7 of my series AI What the Fuck, and also the end of episode 52 of The Human Signal. It feels so good to be back on the horse. After recording today and filling in the blanks of what was happening over the last couple of months, it’s made me realize how much I have missed this and how good it feels to have a place where I can express my ideas, talk freely, speak my mind, and process a lot of the stuff that’s going on.

I’ll be back in the next day or two with part eight. In the meantime, you can follow along on Substack. You can also find me on Instagram and on YouTube. This podcast is shared mainly on Apple Podcasts, but you can find it on some other streaming platforms too. I don’t share this podcast on Spotify and I also don’t share it currently on YouTube, mainly for reasons to do with AI scraping and just trying to work all that stuff out as I go. But anyway, mainly you’ll find me on Substack.

Thanks so much for tuning in. Please follow along, subscribe, all that stuff. I’m back. I’m back. I’m back. And I will see you in the next one. Until then, remember: put humans first. Don’t feed the machines.



This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://laurasheeran.substack.com/subscribe?utm
medium=podcast&utmcampaign=CTA2">laurasheeran.substack.com/subscribe

Want to find AI jobs?

Join thousands of AI professionals finding their next opportunity

We respect your inbox. Unsubscribe at any time.

© 2026 The Human Signal — with Laura Sheeran. All rights reserved.

Common Questions

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers about how DevFound's AI matching, resumes, and referrals work.

DevFound's AI Copilot ingests your profile, goals, and live job data to deliver curated matches in seconds. Every match includes a resume variant, suggested referrals, and interview prep so you can act immediately. The more feedback you provide, the sharper the Copilot becomes.

AI-led job searches shrink the hours spent sifting through boards and formatting resumes. DevFound pairs automation with your personal outreach, so you reserve energy for interviews and negotiation. Traditional networking still matters, but AI gives you a lift before you even send a message.

Modern AI roles expect comfort with production-grade code, data fluency, and practical ML tooling. The strongest candidates pair deep technical chops with storytelling—translating model impact to product, GTM, and exec partners. Continuous learning keeps you ahead as stacks evolve.

DevFound rewards active seekers. Keep your profile fresh, respond to match quality prompts, and enable alerts so you never miss a role. The AI prioritizes companies and teams that align with your feedback, accelerating both introductions and interview invites.

High-density tech hubs continue to host the deepest AI talent pools, yet distributed teams are catching up fast. Use DevFound filters to hone in on onsite, hybrid, or fully remote roles and watch openings expand across time zones.

DevFound aggregates thousands of remote AI openings and flags the nuances—core hours, async culture, and visa needs—up front. The Copilot also recommends how to position your distributed work experience so hiring managers know you can thrive on a remote team.